The Rohingya, a Muslim minority group in Myanmars Rakhine State, have endured decades of marginalisation, persecution, and violence. International organisations, regional bodies and local civil society groups have undertaken a range of efforts to alleviate suffering, protect human rights, and seek durable solutions. This page summarizes the main aspects of those interventions, the challenges they face, and the outlook for the Rohingya population.
Since Myanmars independence in 1948, the Rohingya have been denied full citizenship under the 1982 Citizenship Law. Their status as stateless has left them vulnerable to discrimination in employment, education, health care and movement. Periodic military operations, most dramatically in August 2017, resulted in mass displacement of over 700,000 Rohingya to Bangladesh and other neighbouring countries.
Following the 2017 exodus, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and partner agencies launched the largest humanitarian response in the region. Key elements included:
In the Kutupalong and Balukhali camps in Bangladesh, agencies have moved towards protracted refugee programming, which includes:
Humanitarian organisations have repeatedly requested safe, unhindered access to Rohingya who remain in Rakhine State. In 2020 the government of Myanmar allowed limited entry to a small number of NGOs for health and nutrition surveys, though access remains heavily restricted.
International legal actions have been launched to hold perpetrators accountable:
Several rounds of repatriation talks have been mediated by the United Nations. The most recent pilot program in 2022 aimed to return 2,000 families to designated safe zones. However, concerns over security, lack of basic services, and the absence of a clear citizenship pathway have stalled largescale returns.
Bangladesh has hosted the majority of Rohingya refugees, granting them temporary protection status and allowing them to work in limited sectors. In 2022, the government announced plans to develop a permanent settlement on the island of Bhasan Char, a controversial move criticized for environmental and safety concerns.
ASEANs principle of noninterference has limited collective action, yet the bloc has supported UNled humanitarian operations and provided modest financial contributions for shelter and health programs.
Donor countries and multilateral institutions have contributed over US$4billion since 2017. The European Union, United States, Japan and Canada are among the largest funders, supporting both emergency relief and developmentoriented projects aimed at eventual return and integration.
Longterm solutions will likely require a combination of three interconnected pathways:
Until these conditions are met, humanitarian actors will continue to provide essential services while advocating for the Rohingyas human rights.
All statistics are based on UNreported data up to March2024.
